U.S. Court Engages in Celsius and Tether Dispute

A bankruptcy court in the United States has agreed to continue with the legal proceedings initiated by Celsius Network against Tether, a major stablecoin issuer. This confrontation arises from Celsius’ accusations following its financial turmoil in 2022, where it alleged that Tether prematurely liquidated 39,500 BTC, worth around $812 million, placed as collateral.

What Led to the Conflict?

During the highly volatile crypto market in 2022, Celsius Network faced substantial financial strain. They accused Tether of selling off the Bitcoin that was used as collateral, allegedly breaking both their contract and principles of fair dealing. This liquidation supposedly happened at an average Bitcoin price of $20,656.

According to Celsius, the liquidation was executed nine hours prior to the end of the 10-hour margin call grace period, breaching their contract and causing Celsius significant financial damage. The liquidated assets were reportedly funneled into Tether’s Bitfinex accounts.

Reactions and Arguments

Tether labeled the allegations groundless, arguing that Celsius failed to maintain adequate collateral. They challenged the U.S. court’s authority over this internationally involved case, seeking dismissal.

“When Celsius chose not to post additional collateral, it directed Tether to liquidate the BTC it held and close the position worth approximately 815 million USD₩.”

“Despite the clarity of the agreement months ago, this case tries to shift Celsius’ management errors onto Tether.”

Tether, having moved its headquarters to El Salvador in early 2025, aimed to reinforce its argument against the jurisdiction of U.S. courts. However, the court maintained its authority due to Tether’s assets within the U.S.

How Will This Affect the Crypto Market?

With the case moving forward, Celsius’ accusations against Tether will be rigorously assessed. The focus will be on the integrity of the contract, relevant legislation, and collateral processes. The outcome could notably affect contractual dynamics and collateral policies among key crypto firms.

The swift changes in the crypto landscape and high-stakes trades between major entities continue to highlight the need for clear regulatory and legal frameworks regarding secured lending and liquidation practices, which market participants are keenly observing.

Precedents from similar disputes reveal challenges in interpreting contract terms and jurisdictional claims within the global legal arena. The impact of a company’s relocation on legal proceedings remains part of this complex puzzle.

• The court’s judgment could influence the financial responsibilities of both entities significantly.
• This ruling has the potential to guide policy-making for other players in the industry.
• It could serve as a precedent in future legal disputes between major crypto companies.

The U.S. court’s decision to advance the lawsuit between Celsius and Tether reopens crucial legal discussions within the global cryptocurrency sector. The proceeding aims to scrutinize Bitcoin collateral terms, the timeline for margin calls, and the conditions of liquidation. Its conclusions are expected to shed light on how financial transactions are regulated and how agreements among platforms might evolve.